Home

Forum

Great Britain HQ

Power Rankings

About | Contact

Archive for the ‘Analysis’ Category

Sobering Look at Bulls’ Circus Trip

Tuesday, November 18th, 2008

Every November the Bulls go on a early season road trip, called “The Circus Trip” and come back with a hole that they have to dig themselves out of. Since Jordan retired, in the Bulls’ nine full circus trips (that is excluding the lockout season), the Bulls have gone a combined 6-52 on the circus trip. The Bulls have barely won 10% of their circus trip games.

It is not like all of these teams were that good. The Bulls have entered the circus trip with a combined 18-42 in past seasons. Not exactly great play, but there is a noticeable drop off in performance when the Bulls’ go on the circus trip from their early November play.

From 1999 to 2003, the Bulls went a combined 0-32 on the circus trip. It wasn’t until the Bulls got Ben Gordon and Luol Deng that they were able to win their first circus trip game. The Bulls beat the Utah Jazz 101-99 on November 24, 2008 to win their first game after starting the season 0-9. Eddy Curry played a big role in the Bulls’ win, scoring 21 points, but the Bulls’ savior was Ben Gordon, who finished with 22 points, and led the Bulls to victory in the fourth.

Since the arrival of Deng and Gordon, the Bulls have gone a combined 6-20. With Gordon and Deng, the Bulls have entered the circus trip with a combined 7-14 record.

The Bulls’ best circus trip was in 2005, when the Bulls went 3-3 on the circus trip after starting the season 3-2.

So how will the Bulls do on this year’s circus trip? I plotted the Bulls’ pre-circus trip win percentage against their circus trip in the 9 full circus trips since Jordan retired. Then I put a trend line over those points.

>

The Bulls went 5-5 prior to the circus trip this year, for a 50% win percentage. The 50% pre-circus trip win percentage on the x-axis intercepts the trend line at approximately 17%.

As a result, the Bulls predicted record on the circus trip is: 1-6

This is the result of the Bulls’ unbearably bad play on multiple circus trips. The Bulls have gone win-less on five of the circus trips, won 1 game on three of the circus trips, and won multiple games on only one of the circus trips.

Here is what the plot looks like for just the years that Gordon and Deng have been with us.

This outlook is a little brighter. On this plot, the trend line intercepts the 50% win percentage mark on the x-axis at approximately 31%.

Using this, the Bulls predicted record on the circus trip is: 2-5

What does this all mean? It means that fans should not be expecting too much out of the Bulls on this circus trip. Fans should expect the team to do very poorly on the circus trip.

However, this Bulls team has one big thing going for it that the others didn’t, and that is double star power. In the past few years, the Bulls only had Gordon as a guy who could just go out and win you a game by himself. This year, the Bulls have two of those guys with the addition of Derrick Rose.

The Bulls also have the detriment of shaky road play going against them this year. The Bulls are currently 0-3 on the road and lost their games by an average of 11 points a game. However, it is hard to say that we lost those games because we were on the road. It is more likely we just lost those games because they were going against really good teams. In our power rankings the Celtics are currently ranked 2, the Cavaliers 3, and the Magic 4, so we were losing to some of the best team’s in the league in our 3 road games.

The Bulls are currently 1-5 against team’s above them in our power rankings and 4-0 against teams that they are ranked ahead of in our power rankings. So far, the Bulls are winning the games they are supposed to win. If this trend holds true, the Bulls would be expected to go 2-5 on the circus trip, winning their game against the Warriors while losing 5 out of the 6 games against the Lakers, Blazers, Nuggets, Jazz, Spurs, and 76ers.

As a result of all of this, the Dabullz.com prediction for the Bulls’ circus trip record is 2-5.

Qualifying Offer: Good or Bad Idea?

Monday, September 1st, 2008

Many people have said that Ben Gordon would have to be an idiot not to take the Bulls offer and that he will never see that money again. Assuming the Bulls improve a bit, to around a .500 team, one would assume that if Gordon performs about the same as last year (18 PPG), he will get around the same offer. If he performs worse, he will get less, and if he performs better, he will get more.

There are two things that are big money makers in the NBA. Being a great all around big man and being a great scorer. There is something about the scoring average of a player, just the general PPG, that boosts their value so much in contract negotiations. 20 PPG seems to be the threshold that needs to be met to be a legit first option. When you begin getting in that 22-23 PPG territory, you begin looking like a lock for an allstar spot. When you start scoring over 25 PPG, people begin to look at you as one of the elite players in the game.

So this question should be posed, “Is Ben Gordon making a poor decision if he decides to take the qualifying offer?” If he has a real down year, and only scores something like 14 PPG, he will be looking at the MLE in a best case scenar

io. If he scores 18 PPG again, he will probably looking at around the same. If he scores 20 PPG, he will begin getting paid around what Monta Ellis is making. If he scores 22 PPG, he should be looking at around the same amount that Iguodala just signed for. If he scores 25 PPG or more, he could very well be looking at a true max contract.

So the rewards of taking the qualifying offer are all there. If Gordon really thinks he is an all-star level player, and plans on bringing that type of game next year, he would be crazy not to take the qualifying offer. But if he is afraid that he is really the player that he showed up as last year, or fears that the Bulls coaching staff will cut his minutes, taking the qualifying offer no longer looks so good. So this seems at first look as a high risk, high reward situation.

Fortunately for Gordon, Vinny Del Negro said on the radio last week that Gordon would be welcomed with open arms and would be a big part of what the Bulls do. Vinny expects Gordon to want to prove himself next year, so Vinny will probably give him the minutes he deserves.

So based on this assumption that Gordon will get his playing time, how should we expect Ben Gordon to perform? Based on Ben Gordon’s statistical data from January of his 2nd season to April of his 4th season, I ran a simulation which simulates what Ben Gordon might score throughout the 2008-2009 NBA Season. I used from January of his 2nd season on, because in that January, Gordon clearly took his game up to another level. I ran the simulation 1,000 times.

Here are the raw results of what Ben Gordon averaged.

10 - 0.1%
11 - 0.5%
12 - 0.4%
13 - 0.3%
14 - 0.8%
15 - 2.2%
16 - 3.6%
17 - 4.8%
18 - 13.8%
19 - 33.0%
20 - 15.8%
21 - 14.4%
22 - 2.8%
23 - 4.5%
24 - 1.0%
25 - 0.3%
26 - 0.3%
27 - 0.1%
28 - 0.2%
29 - 0.4%
30 - 0.1%
31 - 0.2%
32 - 0.2%

Or in terms of likelihood Gordon achieves at least this PPG.

10 - 100%
11 - 99.9%
12 - 99.4%
13 - 99.0%
14 - 98.7%
15 - 97.9%
16 - 95.7%
17 - 92.1%
18 - 87.3%
19 - 73.5%
20 - 40.5%
21 - 24.7%
22 - 10.3%
23 - 7.5%
24 - 3.0%
25 - 2.0%
26 - 1.7%
27 - 1.4%
28 - 1.3%
29 - 1.1%
30 - 0.7%
31 - 0.6%
32 - 0.4%

So to simplify this a bit, lets look at the odds of Gordon decreasing, maintaining, or increasing his value.

Decreases (10-17 PPG) - 12.7%
Maintains (18-19 PPG) - 46.8%
Increases (20-32 PPG) - 40.3%

When looked at this way, it becomes clear that the qualifying offer is probably a good idea. Ben Gordon has a high chance of increasing his value, while a very low risk of decreasing his value.

Now let’s break these down into smaller categories.

Significantly Damages Value (10-15 PPG) - 4.3%

There is very little risk for Gordon to significantly damage his value. If he went down into this range of scoring, the MLE would be the absolute maximum that Ben Gordon would be able to get.

Slightly Damages Value (16-17 PPG) - 8.4%

Again, there is very little risk of Gordon even slightly damaging his value next season. This would drop him into that contract that is at the MLE as a minimum, but maybe a million or two million more.

Maintains Value (18-19 PPG) - 46.8%

This is the most likely scenario for Ben Gordon. This would put him in the range of what the Bulls are offering him at this time. So Gordon, if he maintains his value, should be looking at around $56-60 million.

Slightly Increases Value (20-21 PPG) - 30.2%

Ben Gordon has a pretty good chance to slightly improve his value. This would essentially mean returning to 2006-2007 form for Gordon. In the 2007 offseason, John Paxson offered Ben Gordon a contract worth $10 million a year. John Paxson thinks with extensions, players should take a pay cut for longterm security, so in reality, Paxson probably truly valued Gordon at around $11-12 million. If Gordon reaches this level, he should be making anywhere from Monta Ellis money ($66 million / 6 years) to Luol Deng money ($71 million / 6 years)

Significantly Increases Value (22-24 PPG) - 8.3%

The chances that Ben Gordon significantly increases his value is about the same as the chance that he slightly decreases his value. When Ben Gordon enters this range, he begins to look like a lock for an all-star spot, and all-star’s generally get paid more money. This is the Ben Gordon that many Bulls fans expected to show up for the 2007-2008 season. If Gordon reaches this level, he should be looking at Iguodala money ($80 million / 6 years).

Becomes a Max Player (25+ PPG) - 1.8%

If Ben Gordon begins to average more than 25 points a game, he should be looking at a max or near max deal. This volume of scoring would make Gordon one of the elite scorers in the game. While the chances of this are small, they are hardly impossible. Ben Gordon has a better chance of achieving this than the Bulls had of getting Derrick Rose in the NBA Draft.

So based on the simulation, which was based on Ben Gordon’s statistical data, all signs point to the qualifying offer being Ben Gordon’s best possible decision if the Bulls do not increase their offer. The odds of Gordon decreasing his value are small while the odds of him increasing his value are large.

Verdict: Ben Gordon should take the qualifying offer.

How Much Should the Bulls Pay Gordon?

Tuesday, August 12th, 2008

The Chicago Bulls are currently offering Ben Gordon a $59 million over 6 year deal. Ben Gordon has yet to accept the offer.

But how much is Ben Gordon actually worth? I have attempted here to determine his worth by comparing him to the other restricted free agents and would be restricted free agents who accepted extensions last summer, based on statistics, size, and winning. Statistics account for approximately 82% of determining the contract value, and size and winning account for approximately 9% each.

The statistics used in determining the players value are PPG, RPG, APG, TS%, SPG, BPG, FTA, O-Rtg, and D-Rtg. The players combined past 2 seasons were the numbers used.

The amount of a winner that a player is, is determined by total wins, playoff appearances, playoff wins, and playoff series wins. Devin Harris is first in winning, Ben Gordon second, Luol Deng third and Al Jefferson is 2nd to last, and Emeka Okafor is last.

In terms of size, the centers get the biggest benefit, followed by the power forwards, then small forwards, than normal sized shooting guards, then point guards, then small shooting guards. Dwight Howard is ranked first in size, while Ben Gordon is ranked last.

The players are ranked in each category, and then they each have an overall rank that is calculated from each individual category rank.

I have extrapolated the total contract value of guys on five years deal to what they would be worth on a six year deal. The guys ranked in terms of total contract value below. Ben Gordon has been assigned the average value below for the guys that have already signed their new deals.

1. Dwight Howard - $106 million
2. Al Jefferson - $82 million
3. Andre Iguodala - $80 million
4. Josh Smith - $73 million
5. Luol Deng - $71 million
6. Emeka Okafor - $70 million
7. Ben Gordon - $70 million
8. Kevin Martin - $69 million
9. Monta Ellis - $66 million
10. Andris Biedrins - $63 million
11. Devin Harris - $53 million
12. Jameer Nelson - $38 million

Now, the players are ranked in their determined order based on their stats, winning, and size.

1. Dwight Howard - 4.36
2. Andre Iguodala - 5.45
3. Luol Deng - 6.18
4. Josh Smith - 6.18
5. Kevin Martin - 6.18
6. Andris Biedrins - 6.55
7. Monta Ellis - 6.64
8. Devin Harris - 6.73
9. Emeka Okafor - 7
10. Al Jefferson - 7.27
11. Ben Gordon - 7.54
12. Jameer Nelson - 8.91

So if we are to put these numbers on a normal curve, these are the contract values of the players:

1. Dwight Howard - $106 million
2. Andre Iguodala - $88 million
3. Luol Deng - $76 million
4. Josh Smith - $76 million
5. Kevin Martin - $76 million
6. Andris Biedrins - $71 million
7. Monta Ellis - $69 million
8. Devin Harris - $68 million
9. Emeka Okafor - $64 million
10. Al Jefferson - $60 million
11. Ben Gordon - $56 million
12. Jameer Nelson - $38 million

So based on this, Ben Gordon is worth $56 million. However, people should not take this to mean that the Bulls are offering too much with the $59 million offer. If you account Ben Gordon being a legit first or second option, while players such as Andris Biedrins and Devin Harris cannot be categorized as such, one would think that Gordon should get a bit of a pay bump for that, while Biedrins and Harris should have their pay brought down a bit, as Gordon is more responsible for the Bulls success than Harris was for the Mavericks. Therefore, the Bulls $59 million offer for Ben Gordon seems fair based on what the players have done in their careers and their role.

Ben Gordon should absolutely continue holding out (hopefully only to the Great Britain deadline) to see if he can get a few more million from the Bulls. But at the end of the day (in this case, negotiating cycle), Gordon should accept the Bulls $59 million offer, as it is a fair offer.

However, Gordon wouldn’t be crazy if he took the qualifying offer. The Bulls new focus towards a faster paced offense and the addition of Derrick Rose, should help boost Gordon’s scoring and passing numbers. In addition, the free agent market will be favorable to Gordon next year.

Still, the Bulls are making a very fair offer to Gordon. Gordon’s best course of action is to continue to hold out and fight for more money to see how much more he can get out of the Bulls, with it already determined in his mind that he will take the Bulls $59 million offer if that is the highest they are willing to go.

Ben Gordon: By the Numbers

Wednesday, July 30th, 2008

With the Chicago Bulls signing of Luol Deng Tuesday to a deal, fans are left wondering, what about Ben Gordon? Past rumors have suggested that the Bulls’ ownership will not be willing to go into the luxury tax. The Chicago newspapers are reporting that Ben Gordon’s agent, Raymond Brothers, is demanding that Gordon receive as much as Deng because he has been the Bulls top scorer the past three seasons. Today, on Waddle and Silvy, John Paxson stated that he can now make Ben Gordon a more cost certain offer based on their budget sheets now that the Deng deal is done. So what might Ben Gordon’s contract numbers look like? Here is a look, by the numbers.

First, we must look at Luol Deng’s contract. Luol Deng signed a deal worth $71 million over 6 years, with the possibility of being worth $80 million after incentives. If the NBA rules that Luol Deng is unlikely to reach the criteria for his incentives, his first year salary will count as $9,372,937.29. If the NBA rules that Deng is likely to reach the criteria for his incentives, his first year salary will count as $10,561,056.11.

Next, the Bulls total salary situation should be looked at. Adding Deng’s first year salary to the rest of our contracts, assuming he does not meet the criteria for his incentives, the Bulls will be at approximately $63,491,910. Adding Deng’s first year salary to the rest of our contracts, assuming he does meet the criteria for his incentives, the Bulls will be at approximately $64,680,029. (Salary numbers are assuming the Bulls do not retain JamesOn Curry).

The luxury tax figure for the 2008-2009 NBA season will be $71,150,000. This means, assuming Deng is not determined by the NBA to be likely to achieve the criteria for his incentives, the Bulls would have $7,658,090 left to offer Gordon in the first year of his contract. This means the Bulls would be able to offer Gordon approximately $58.1 million over 6 years and be able to stay under the luxury tax. Assuming Deng is determined by the NBA to be likely to achieve the crieteria for his incentives, the Bulls would have $6,469,971 to offer Gordon. This means the Bulls would be able to offer Gordon approximately $49 million over 6 years. Ben Gordon will not agree to that deal considering he turned down an offer worth more over a period of only 5 years last summer.

It is unlikely that any of the Luol Deng likely to achieve incentive criteria numbers will have to be used. The NBA determines if a player is likely to achieve his incentives based on the previous season. Since all of Luol Deng’s performance incentives are team oriented, he is unlikely to be labeled as likely to achieve criteria for the incentives because of the Bulls season in 2007-2008.

The next big number to look at is $6,404,749. That is the amount of Ben Gordon’s qualifying offer. A first year offer of $6,404,749 equates to a deal worth $48.5 million over 6 years. Therefore, any deal less than $48.5 million causes Ben Gordon to make less money than he would if he takes the qualifying offer next year, so any offer of less than $48.5 million will be absolutely unacceptable.

If the Bulls are serious about retaining Ben Gordon, their leading scorer for the past three seasons, they will have to go into the luxury tax, unless Gordon gives the Bulls a bargain or John Paxson makes a money saving trade. Going into the luxury tax is a bit of a costly move. Not only will the Bulls have to pay double for every dollar they are over the luxury tax threshold, but they will also lose their share in the pot of tax dollars at the end of the season.

It should be expected for the Bulls to go into the luxury tax, just for one season, to retain their leading scorer for the past three seasons. The Bulls have been the most profitable team in the NBA since Jordan retired, despite only making the playoff three times and only winning one playoff series. Since the NBA introduced the luxury tax, the Bulls have received $9.2 million from other teams being taxed. Bulls ownership should just pretend that they are paying this years luxury tax with money they received in the past as the result of the luxury tax.

Ben Gordon’s agent, Raymond Brothers, have said that Ben Gordon should get what Luol Deng received because Gordon has been the Bulls leading scorer the past three seasons. Is it crazy for Ben Gordon to demand $80 million? Not exactly, if Gordon is willing to go out of his way to earn his $80 million through incentives. NBA teams can offer incentives up to 25% of players salary for a season. So if Ben Gordon signed that $58.1 million over six year deal, the Bulls could pad it up to $72.6 million with incentives. Not quite the $80 million Gordon is looking for, but definitely an improvement over $58.1 million.

The Bulls would have to give Ben Gordon $64 million in guaranteed money in order to make Gordon an offer worth $80 million. The deal would give Gordon the potential of earning $16 million in incentives. In order to make Gordon this offer, the Bulls would have to go $790,000 into the luxury tax. Are the Bulls really willing to lose Ben Gordon over the amount of money equal to a league minimum contract of a player with two years in the league? That would be an unforgivable, boneheaded move by Bulls ownership if they were to go this route.

$72.6 million is the most the Bulls will be able to offer Gordon without hitting the luxury tax. Could the Bulls do anything to make this offer more attractive? They could try offering Gordon a signing bonus. NBA teams are allowed to give players up to a 20% signing bonus. In such a scenario, Gordon would still have a base contract worth $58.1, and a potential $14.5 million in incentives, but he would receive $17.4 million from the Bulls next season, making the deal much more attractive to Gordon. While he receives $17.4 million as the result of his signing bonus next year, he would still count against the salary cap as approximately $7.66 million.

The Bulls could potentially make an attractive offer to Gordon using incentives and/or a signing bonus. However, the Bulls may need to go into the luxury tax just a little if Gordon wants more total guaranteed money throughout his contract.

All salary figures are from ShamSports.com.