Welcome to Dabullz

Featured Post

Bulls Need To Go All In
When the Bulls decided to let Ben Gordon walk to the Detroit Pistons this past offseason, they signaled that they were going to pursue 2010 free agency. The Bulls face one major problem, which...
Read More ...


Comment

Comment here if you like this plugin.

Member Login

Sign Up Now!

Math Required!
What is the sum of: 10 + 2    

Forgot Password !

New password will be e-mailed to you.

Powered by

Home

Power Rankings

Contests

About

Contact

Posts Tagged ‘Atlanta Hawks’

2009-2010 Power Rankings - Week 11

Sunday, January 10th, 2010

1. Boston Celtics - 97.09110809
2. Los Angeles Lakers - 96.23695606
3. Cleveland Cavaliers - 95.96925995
4. Dallas Mavericks - 93.29128104
5. Orlando Magic - 92.74592282
6. Atlanta Hawks - 90.6801248
7. San Antonio Spurs - 89.85378126
8. Portland Trail Blazers - 89.11698158
9. Phoenix Suns - 88.8448073
10. Denver Nuggets - 88.78509466
11. Oklahoma City Thunder - 88.19723688
12. Miami Heat - 86.64786563
13. Houston Rockets - 86.54235316
14. Utah Jazz - 85.72642726
15. Memphis Grizzlies - 82.68375435
16. Toronto Raptors - 82.65221533
17. New Orleans Hornets - 81.58930876
18. Los Angeles Clippers - 81.48618476
19. Milwaukee Bucks - 80.87913298
20. New York Knicks - 80.733524
21. Charlotte Bobcats - 79.74848855
22. Sacramento Kings - 78.14215859
23. Chicago Bulls - 77.67040777
24. Washington Wizards - 77.62351403
25. Philadelphia 76ers - 76.79352679
26. Golden State Warriors - 74.71841182
27. Detroit Pistons - 74.05881037
28. Indiana Pacers - 73.71263082
29. Minnesota Timberwolves - 70.07581229
30. New Jersey Nets - 64.57433245

2009-2010 Power Rankings - Week 10

Sunday, January 3rd, 2010

1. Los Angeles Lakers - 97.31343181
2. Boston Celtics - 96.70934681
3. Cleveland Cavaliers - 96.00231091
4. Orlando Magic - 93.80917918
5. Dallas Mavericks - 93.44483347
6. Atlanta Hawks - 91.17138088
7. San Antonio Spurs - 90.10669577
8. Portland Trail Blazers - 89.19846473
9. Denver Nuggets - 88.63571121
10. Phoenix Suns - 87.31533131
11. Houston Rockets - 86.72524182
12. Oklahoma City Thunder - 86.47244937
13. Miami Heat - 84.70969601
14. Utah Jazz - 84.48189577
15. Memphis Grizzlies - 81.98791773
16. Toronto Raptors - 79.5810086
17. Los Angeles Clippers - 79.56145316
18. New York Knicks - 79.29919319
19. Milwaukee Bucks - 78.23391633
20. New Orleans Hornets - 78.11032041
21. Sacramento Kings - 77.77323118
22. Chicago Bulls - 77.74640951
23. Charlotte Bobcats - 77.46536279
24. Washington Wizards - 75.92258969
25. Detroit Pistons - 74.77870483
26. Philadelphia 76ers- 74.35075076
27. Indiana Pacers - 73.9924849
28. Golden State Warriors - 72.68995327
29. Minnesota Timberwolves - 69.33966297
30. New Jersey Nets - 64.83572184

2009-2010 Power Rankings - Week 7

Sunday, December 13th, 2009

1. Boston Celtics - 98.61599297
2. Los Angeles Lakers - 94.32885139
3. Orlando Magic - 92.64145695
4. Atlanta Hawks - 92.12477223
5. Dallas Mavericks - 91.43577365
6. Denver Nuggets - 90.189023
7. Cleveland Cavaliers - 90.027552
8. Phoenix Suns - 87.2460405
9. Houston Rockets - 86.96593225
10. Oklahoma City Thunder - 86.45765016
11. Portland Trail Blazers - 85.05060155
12. Utah Jazz- 84.12495838
13. Miami Heat - 83.56653612
14. San Antonio Spurs - 81.57006081
15. Milwaukee Bucks - 79.66665728
16. Detroit Pistons - 79.1607668
17. Los Angeles Clippers - 78.59712519
18. Sacramento Kings - 76.8116151
19. New Orleans Hornets - 76.50493999
20. Indiana Pacers - 76.35917675
21. New York Knicks - 76.22681851
22. Memphis Grizzlies - 75.92817743
23. Toronto Raptors - 75.74750039
24. Charlotte Bobcats - 75.70946478
25. Washington Wizards - 75.05702002
26. Golden State Warriors - 73.20632655
27. Chicago Bulls - 72.65158055
28. Philadelphia 76ers - 70.04531128
29. Minnesota Timberwolves - 65.10387236
30. New Jersey Nets - 64.43645582

Why the Bull Are Bad, and How To Improve

Tuesday, December 8th, 2009

In the offseason, the Chicago Bulls made a new commitment to defense. They were going to be a team that beats other teams with their defense, not their offense. However, after a dominant defensive start, the Bulls are quickly becoming one of the league’s worst defensive teams.

The Bulls are currently ranked 20th in the league in defensive rating, posting a defensive rating of 107.6. Their defensive rating is better this year, than last year, when they posted a defensive rating of 108.7. However, relative to the rest of the league, they are worse this year than last year. Last year they were ranked 18th in defensive rating.

Their actual defense is probably worse than last year’s as well. It should be taken into account that the league is worse as a whole offensively than it was last year. Teams are scoring 1.6 fewer points per 100 possessions this year than they were last year. If you adjust the Bulls defensive rating to the better offensive production of last season, than it is clear that the Bulls are probably around the same or worse defensively this year than last year.

The league wide drop in offensive production is likely a result of more team’s penny pinching. With the economy the way it is, team’s are going to be less likely to spend money to get good bench players for their teams. This problem is seen with the Bulls, who let Ben Gordon walk in free agency, did not sign Derrick Byars after training camp, and passed on signing Allen Iverson, all in efforts to avoid spending more money, and keep profits up.

But how are the Bulls worse defensively? Shouldn’t having a proper sized shooting guard in John Salmons improve the Bulls defense drastically over last year’s team, which featured the shorter Ben Gordon at shooting guard? The truth is that perimeter defense is overrated in the NBA.

Ben Gordon did everything that is needed of an NBA guard. He did a good job staying between his man and the basket, and contested shots. The difference between him, and Kirk Hinrich, who is a great defender, in what the opposing shooting guard scores and on what efficiency is going to be minimal, as ever since the rule changes before the 04-05 season, which allowed for no contact on the perimeter, good offensive guard when going up against good defensive guards usually put up their normal numbers.

Where a good defensive team is made is in the front court. Brad Miller and Joakim Noah both have negative Player Efficiency Rating differentials at the center position, where they play the majority of their minutes. Taj Gibson, who plays 42% of the team’s power forward minutes is especially bad, posting a PER differential of -9.7.

The one bright spot is Joakim Noah at the power forward position, where he plays 28.6% of his minutes. Noah has a +7.1 PER differential when playing the power forward spot.

Joakim Noah’s problem at the center position is that he is too small. He has a shorter standing reach than most centers, and because of his weight, he can have some difficulty holding position in the low post.

The Bulls should look into moving Joakim Noah to the power forward position and starting Brad Miller in order to improve their defense. If the Bulls continue to play the way they are playing, they may play themselves into a high draft pick, which could land them a real center, such as Kansas’ Cole Aldrich, who would provide a long term solution for the Bulls at the center spot.

However, the Bulls’ defensive problems are miniscule in comparison to their offensive problems. The Bulls are currently ranked 27th in the league in offensive rating, with an offensive rating of 99.5. Now there is nothing wrong with a team being a defensive focused team, but there is a problem with a team being as bad on offense as the Bulls have been.

In order for the Bulls to have an even point differential, they would need to have a defensive rating of 99.5 also. If the Bulls were to have that defensive rating, they would be the 2nd best defensive team in the league. So in order to have just an average team with an offense this bad, a team needs to be one of the league’s best defensive teams.

If the Bulls wanted to be a good team, say as good as the Atlanta Hawks of last season, they would need to have a point differential of 1.7. In order to have this point differential with this offense, the Bulls would need a defensive rating of 97.8. If the Bulls were to post that defensive rating, they would be the best defensive team since the rule changes in 04-05.

So in order to be as good as last year’s 47-35, second round and out Atlanta Hawks, the Bulls would need to be one of the best defensive teams of all time, if they were to continue playing at their current offensive level.

If the Bulls want to get better as a team, they will need to get better offensively. It is impossible to be a good team with an offense this bad

How can the Bulls improve their offense? The most obvious way is to start shooting more three point shots. The Bulls are currently last in the league in three point field goal attempts and makes. One of the simple truths of basketball is that making a three point shot is better than making a two point shot, because 3 > 2.

This is one of the main facets of an offense like Mike D’Antoni. D’Antoni encourages players to shoot wide open three point shots, even if they don’t shoot the best percentage. If a player shoots 33.3% from three point land, that is equal to shooting 50% on two point field goals. If a player only to take threes when they take jumpshots, and shot 33.3%, taking 7 three point shots a game, while making 70% of their baskets close to the basket, and taking 3 of those shots per a game, they would score at an efficient 56 TS%.

Making three pointers is key in boosting up offensive efficiency. So the best way to improve the Bulls offense will be to start hoisting up more three point shots. Rose, Deng, and Salmons need to stop passing up the wide open three point shot, as taking that shot is the right basketball play to make.

John Salmons and Luol Deng in particular need to start taking more three point shots. Salmons is a career 35.9% (53.9 TS%) three point shooter. Luol Deng has made 41.8% (62.7 TS%) of his threes over the past three seasons. These guys have shown to be good enough three point shooters to have free reign to jack up the open three point shot.

The Bulls need to implement these changes fast, because if they fail to improve their offense, they are going to be a bad team all year long.

2009-2010 Power Rankings - Week 6

Sunday, December 6th, 2009

1. Boston Celtics - 97.41670302
2. Los Angeles Lakers - 95.79455195
3. Orlando Magic - 95.35119103
4. Denver Nuggets - 91.99905467
5. Cleveland Cavaliers - 91.87213907
6. Phoenix Suns - 90.81430009
7. Atlanta Hawks - 90.04026662
8. Dallas Mavericks - 89.92322872
9. Portland Trail Blazers - 87.67986983
10. Houston Rockets - 84.91429101
11. Oklahoma City Thunder - 84.3083509
12. Utah Jazz - 83.88613924
13. Miami Heat - 82.76348402
14. San Antonio Spurs - 80.79083727
15. Milwaukee Bucks - 79.58332963
16. Los Angeles Clippers - 79.02214963
17. Sacramento Kings - 77.96059083
18. Washington Wizards - 76.47618869
19. Toronto Raptors - 76.27227912
20. Charlotte Bobcats - 76.06008517
21. Memphis Grizzlies - 75.38169896
22. Detroit Pistons - 74.984861
23. New Orleans Hornets - 74.52658819
24. Indiana Pacers - 73.81922759
25. Chicago Bulls - 73.56375608
26. Golden State Warriors - 72.95615238
27. New York Knicks - 72.21380956
28. Philadelphia 76ers - 70.67590259
29. Minnesota Timberwolves - 65.70763399
30. New Jersey Nets - 62.64741569

2009-2010 Power Rankings - Week 5

Monday, November 30th, 2009

1. Boston Celtics - 95.5581864
2. Los Angeles Lakers - 95.11305919
3. Phoenix Suns - 94.45843986
4. Orlando Magic - 94.22665253
5. Dallas Mavericks - 91.27628428
6. Cleveland Cavaliers - 90.32139609
7. Denver Nuggets - 89.397316
8. Atlanta Hawks - 89.05334704
9. Portland Trail Blazers - 87.88422835
10. Miami Heat - 84.59677079
11. Oklahoma City Thunder - 84.20420055
12. Houston Rockets - 83.29195114
13. Utah Jazz - 83.05030816
14. San Antonio Spurs - 82.24803077
15. Milwaukee Bucks - 0.73714803
16. Indiana Pacers - 78.18636228
17. Los Angeles Clippers - 78.13554784
18. Sacramento Kings - 77.48367953
19. Charlotte Bobcats - 76.43672343
20. Chicago Bulls - 74.65654209
21. Detroit Pistons - 73.95819815
22. Toronto Raptors - 73.5053964
23. New Orleans Hornets - 73.47975442
24. Washington Wizards - 73.12549831
25. Golden State Warriors - 72.89342885
26. Memphis Grizzlies - 72.81708527
27. Philadelphia 76ers - 71.59112682
28. New York Knicks - 68.48832999
29. Minnesota Timberwolves - 63.6484407
30. New Jersey Nets - 60.28057678

2009-2010 Power Rankings - Week 4

Sunday, November 22nd, 2009

1. Boston Celtics - 96.47321456
2. Dallas Mavericks - 95.84620446
3. Orlando Magic - 95.05178503
4. Atlanta Hawks - 94.20733262
5. Los Angeles Lakers - 93.94380673
6. Phoenix Suns - 93.74761194
7. Cleveland Cavaliers - 93.72879927
8. Portland Trail Blazers - 92.56916513
9. Milwaukee Bucks - 91.65202397
10. Denver Nuggets - 90.73218204
11. Oklahoma City Thunder - 87.03157727
12. Houston Rockets - 86.5629274
13. Miami Heat - 86.53294427
14. Indiana Pacers - 86.2749347
15. Utah Jazz - 83.87026374
16. Chicago Bulls - 79.68301321
17. Toronto Raptors - 78.3435455
18. Detroit Pistons - 77.28783951
19. Philadelphia 76ers - 76.81418052
20. Los Angeles Clippers - 76.45054206
21. San Antonio Spurs - 76.35303896
22. Sacramento Kings - 76.03379184
23. New Orleans Hornets - 75.33009709
24. New York Knicks - 73.71542876
25. Golden State Warriors - 73.60976412
26. Memphis Grizzlies - 71.7302226
27. Washington Wizards - 70.44456409
28. Charlotte Bobcats - 68.6960711
29. Minnesota Timberwolves - 61.07017359
30. New Jersey Nets - 60.82915381